Q:
1. How it is possible that Arab-Jewish Treaty was ratified by League of nations, while League of Nations was only created after the Paris peace conference?
2. We know that "Treaty" is signed only between countries. so can we still refer to Arab-Jewish Treaty as a treaty?
A:
a treaty between nations are always stronger than a treaty between countries, because countries disappear, nations do not.
For example, Hungary and Austria did not have separate countries at that time. It doesn't affect legitimacy of Hungary and Austria.
It is absolutely irrelevant when and who was created. The Treaty was announced and accepted = ratified without any doubts.
Then it was used to create Jewish Mandate for Palestine, which was ratified with all the possible formalities. Then with The Treaty of Lausanne, then with Anglo-American Convention.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Q:
How can we prove (after Oslo and after Sykes–Picot Agreement) That Arab-Jewish ("Feisal Weitzmann") treaty is still valid...?


A:
1) Oslo Agreements are not a big problem if we behave properly and right now. Oslo is only an interim agreement - take a look its title. Interim means temporary. Besides that, with the attempt to establish a state unilaterally, Arabs already broke Article 31 of it, so they broke the whole set of Oslo Agreements.
Therefore we are not bounded with the Oslo Agreements any more!

2) Sykes-Picot Agreement is made between France and Britain, so it puts no obligation on us. Besides, it has nothing to do with sovereignty, but with spheres of interest/influence. They may still have these spheres - no problems for us...

We have much more serious problems, but illiterate Israeli "professionals" was never able to understand them. For example, for over 60 years all Jewish leaders and all Israeli cabinets (governments) support UN's resolution to steal from the Jews Jerusalem, Judea, Samaria. They even celebrate this robbery of the Jews: http://MFA.nymei.org/ - right in Knesset and in MFA!
That's how stupid all of them are!

Not even one single exception from that traitorous stupidity among all Jewish officials!
They create plenty of terrible problems on a daily basis!
Therefore the real specialist must be in control ASAP.
Here is the action that should be done immediately in order to save Israel from the UN's final kill http://NYMEI.org/how-to-save-israel-from-un.html
We are 100% ready to win, but all these bureaucrats cut us off all resources.

---

Q:
According to Arab Jewish Treaty + Mandate for Palestine -> We (Jews) are owners of Palestine.
It is / was globally ratified.
Well, in that case - where was the idea, of us (Jewish people) buying lands from Arabs, born?
Why did Jews have to buy LANDS from Arabs - if we own Palestine?
Thank you very Much

A:
It's a very good question, but the answer is extremely simple.

Your lovely "professionals" are so stupid that they could not even create proper terminology. Therefore you face such semantic difficulties.

We have to distinguish two completely different types ownership:
1) Property ownership
2) Rights for state/country/national sovereignty.

According to the Arab-Jewish Treaty (ratified by all the nations via Mandate and other International Treaties), both sites got into complete agreement, that the ownership (rights) for sovereignty in Palestine is Jewish. It has nothing to do with the property rights.

Therefore some Japanese can buy and sell a house in Palestine or a piece of land. American Indian or an Arab has the same property ownership rights.

By the way, I already explained that to you when teach how to solve the problem with some old Arab houses in Yaffo. Even if we completely recognize their ownership - it is not a problem for Israel. Because it is only property ownership, it can ALWAYS be resolved with the money. Even of they double, triple, whatever the price - it such a small money (compare to daily expenses the problem generates today) that it is absolutely nothing to talk about...

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Q:

Why exactly all "San Remo" Issue may (will) cause failure in matter of legal actions?
Why is "San Remo" so dangerous the the legal case?

A:

First of all, no "San Remo Resolution on Palestine existed".
Non, Not, Нет, Nicht, Lo...
Period.

Unless these enemies, traitors and idiots show anything looking like a Resolution - we have nothing to talk about.

Resolution should be:
- an official paper with
- consistent text and
- clear meaning
- signatures of clearly expressed legal sites
- address for the storage
- etc, etc, etc...
Mandate for Palestine is an example of how such paper should look like.

If it is a "resolution" about recognition of some essential rights - these formal requirements are even stronger.
We can not say that official delegations of Britain, France and 4 more countries can not afford just one typist...
Unless these idiots show such official document - we have nothing but cheap-made forgery, very dangerous false evidence.
--

Falsified garbage in a paid off book is NOT a document.
Besides, as I already stated:

There is NO signatures on that garbage piece of shit
There is NO legal parties/sites
There is NO consistent text
(French and English texts are completely different)
There is NO clear meaning
There is NOTHING required for a legal document
There is absolutely NOTHING required for an official document

Absolutely NOTHING...
--

One more explanation why the San Remo fake is so dangerous.

Can you understand how dangerous it is to hold a fake passport?

Can you understand how suicidal it is to show fake passport to the police or to a court?

Fake passport is the one, which is issued by an organization having no rights to do that. Britain never had any rights for Palestine. Britain is an invader and an illegal occupier of Palestine. So:

1) If our rights was given by in illegal occupier (in San Remo or by the Balfour letter) - then we also became an illegal occupiers.

And it is only the very beginning of our suicide.

2) If we try to accept an illegal password from Britain (like San Remo if it was existed) then we would automatically turn yourselves into followers or hirelings of that illegal occupier.

3) Accepting any of such kind of illegal password we got NO legal rights, but A LOT of terrible troubles, for example like the following one

4) It is not hard to understand that holding fake illegal password could be helpful for a day or two. But it is even more helpful for your enemy, who has perfect option to wait for the time when you are already in trouble. Them he will final kill you using against you that fake password you stupidly present by yourself.

The most terrible situation will be in the court, even when you will try to persecute your enemy.....


To make it crystal clear about San Remo disinformation. Besides discussing more serious problems they also spoke about Mandates, but:

1) Not for Palestine (only for Syria and Mesopotamia),

2) That meeting was handled NOT by League of Nations, but by Entente - France and Britain (and Russia at the start of WWI) military alignment.

3) Everything regarding Mandates was established with the Arab and Jewish National Delegations in Paris in 1919. Mandates are in the Covenant of the League of Nations, which is part of the Treaty of Versailles.
Well-paid traitors like Howard Grief, Eli Hertz, Mark Kaplan and others don't allow to teach the truth. Instead they spread disinformation about San Remo. Besides the first part of the killing Israel problems (above I have already explained that), this disinformation slaughter the Jews from inside:

People like Uri Avnery (he use to be a right-wing fighter) believe in San Remo disinformation and in Balfour disinformation. This disinformation turned us into British and French imperialists' hirelings who follow imperialists' command to steal land from poor Arab kids.

Uri Avnery and many other good people don't want to be imperialist's hirelings. They don't want to have land by imperialist's command. So finally many good people decide that we must return the land to the owners - to Arab kids... All that happened because instead of the truth they know only disinformation about San Remo.

That's the BIGGEST problem with the San Remo disinformation, but somehow you refuse to understand that BIGGEST problem...

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------